November 17th, 2008 | |
Posted in Tech News by Justin Flood

I just read a very interesting article on InfoWorld about the fact that Google Docs has been lagging compared to other free competition like OpenOffice. Somehow that doesn’t surprise me. Here’s some text from the article:
OpenOffice.org was used by 5 percent of people, versus Google Docs’ 1 percent, according to the survey of 2,400 users on their home PCs conducted between May and November of this year. OpenOffice.org was also found to be used more often, 8.7 days, versus 1.5 days; and longer, an average of 9.3 minutes, versus 3.4 minutes for Google Docs, according to ClickStream’s panel, which was two-thirds comprised of women.
During a keynote speech at a Gartner conference last month , Ballmer said: “We have better competition today than Google Docs and Spreadsheets. We get more competition from OpenOffice and StarOffice , frankly.”
Now of course, one study doesn’t mean anything in the real world, but these numbers don’t surprise me in the least. As far as the whole cloud computing movement goes, I don’t think the majority of people see much reason to move a word processor to the cloud. When there are free cross-platform native alternatives like OpenOffice, why would you? OpenOffice runs perfectly well on Windows, Macs, and even the most miniscule of Linux netbooks. Besides the fact that it’s free, I think people are interested in having a word processor that’s available even if the internet is not. Of course there are solutions like Google Gears that bring Web based apps offline, but I have a feeling that people that aren’t extremely tech savvy just aren’t getting that yet. Besides that, I think that many published writers, especially novelists, would be hesitant about moving to a cloud based word processor for fear that someone could hack in and steal a copy of a manuscript in progress, much in the same way that a lot of professional photographers fear putting photos online because of the high level of intellectual property theft.
Besides, unless you’re in a collaborative work environment, or work frequently on the same project from multiple computers, why would a cloud based solution even be remotely interesting to the general public? Unlike pictures and video which are shared frequently among friends and family, documents rarely are. Writing for many people is a private endeavor, except for the obvious example of Blogging, which is almost always edited and written independently of a word processor anyway.
Still, the argument is moot because for the foreseeable future, Microsoft Word will continue to dominate the space. It is fully featured, used by everyone, and a heck of a lot faster than OpenOffice. Then again, for the multiple hundreds of dollars you’ll spend on it, it better be fully featured, standardized, and fast! Though if you don’t have a word processor on your system, or you’re running linux, I can’t recommend OpenOffice highly enough. It’s absolutely a production quality office suite, and something that I think will be far more of a threat to Microsoft in coming years, vs anything that Google puts out.
Tags:
Google Docs,
Microsoft Office,
OpenOffice