Browse > Home / Archive by category 'Corporate injustice'

| Subcribe via RSS

First gen Zunes commit mass suicide

December 31st, 2008 | 1 Comment | Posted in Corporate injustice, Tech News by Justin Flood

Well this is certainly one of the stranger stories of the year.    I woke up this morning to sync my first gen Zune with my daily regiment of Podcasts and music, only to find that it was frozen at the boot screen.   Odd enough, but not unheard of.   I attempted the usual methods of resetting the device, only to find that I would end up back at the same boot screen again.

As I made a trip over to the official Zune forums to find a tip on how to fix this little issue, I found out that every single last original 30 gigabyte Zune had bricked themselves over the course of the night.   Not 10% of them, not 50% of them,  EVERY SINGLE LAST ONE THAT STILL FUNCTIONS.

This goes far beyond random failures, and into the land of class action lawsuit.  Not sure what the issue is with these devices,  but considering it’s firmware agnostic, and device specific, it must be something engrained in the hardware of these Zune 30s.

As of now, the Zune support lines are flooded with calls,  and Microsoft has yet to release a statement on the matter.   I’ll keep this post updated over the course of the day as the story develops.  In the mean time check out the official Zune forums for more information.

Tags: ,

Why the “Big 3″ Automakers may not DESERVE survival

November 20th, 2008 | 3 Comments | Posted in Corporate injustice, General News by Justin Flood

Today, I’ve heard one EXTREMELY stupid thing.  People in the US Government are calling for a bailout of GM and the other “Big 3″ US automakers, due to the fact that they are very near bankruptcy.   I have to say only one thing:

ARE YOU FREAKIN’ INSANE!?  WHY!?

Now I’m of course aware of the 2 million jobs that are held currently by employees of these car-makers,   and their losing there jobs would indeed be not only a tragedy, but a large strain on our government, and our morale as a country.  I’m also aware of the brand-identity that GM, Ford, and Chrysler carry.  They are names like US Steel.  Things that were at one time rock solid, the foundation of the US Economy.  Things that could NEVER possibly go out of business.

The problem is,  that is exactly what’s happening.  And it’s their own fault.

Continue on after the jump:

More »

Tags: , , ,

New York’s Cablevision hijacks 404 error pages

September 24th, 2008 | 9 Comments | Posted in Corporate injustice, Tech News by Justin Flood

Well, this is interesting.  Just took this screenshot of what appears to be an Optimum Online search results page that now comes up whenever I happen to travel to a domain that doesn’t exist.

From what I can see, Cablevision has changed it’s DNS service so that it now hijacks 404 pages to redirect to “domainnotfound.optimum.net” and deliver a page of what look to be Google search results that are supposed to show you the page you were originally looking for.  They are calling this “service” the DNS Assistance Service.

According to the DNS Assistance Service page:

The preceding search results page is displayed to you as a result of the specific Domain Name Service (DNS) servers used by Optimum Online to look up domain names. If you misspell or mistype a web address, dead-end “no such name” errors can occur. However, the DNS servers used by Optimum Online are designed to eliminate dead-end “no such name” error pages you can encounter as you surf the web. By displaying the preceding search results page, users know that the web site they’ve attempted to navigate to does not exist, and are presented with suggested sites they may have been seeking. No software is installed on your computer for this search service to work.

Not only that, they’re serving some SPONSORED RESULTS along with the search results.  I’m going to have a fit.  Hijacking my web connection to deliver YOUR search results is bad enough, hijacking my web connection to serve ADS to me is absolutely insulting and ridiculous.  You certainly aren’t lowering the cost of my internet connection, from the revenue you’re making from AdSense or whatever, so why are you serving me ads?  It’s completely ridiculous.

Sorry Cablevision, but I do NOT approve.  Not one freakin’ bit.  As soon as I get home, I’m switching my PCs to use OpenDNS instead, and I highly suggest all other Cablevision customers to do the same.  We don’t need your help OR your ads.  Thank you very much.

Tags: , , ,

Rip Off Report: 99 cents per song is a waste of your money!

September 18th, 2008 | No Comments | Posted in Corporate injustice, Editorial, Tech News by Justin Flood

Last week Apple announced the updates to it’s iPod line, including a brand new 120 gigabyte iPod classic.  I was kind of surprised to see that actually.  I mean seriously, at $0.99 a song, who could ever fill that up?  Of course people are ripping their old CD libraries as well, but as the marketplace moves primarily to digital downloading, who expects us to fill up a 120 gig iPod one song at a time?  

Think about it.  According to Apple’s website, the 120 gigabyte iPod Classic will hold 30,000 songs.  That means it could theoretically cost you THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS to fill up that iPod.  

Let me state that again in case you missed it:  THIRTY.  THOUSAND.  DOLLARS.   Regardless of whether or not you buy the music on Amazon, or iTunes,  whether it’s DRM-free or not,  the result is the same.  That’s an astronomical amount of money to pay for music.   Chances are that’s  more than your CAR cost you.   And, if you aren’t smart, a hard drive crash, or a change in the DRM scheme at Apple could theoretically make that purchase vanish into thin air.  

(note:  Yes, I am aware you can fill it with more than just music, but Let’s just discuss music for the moment.)

Even establishing a relatively small collection of music, perhaps a couple thousand songs, could run you well in the thousands of dollars.   Point being,  if you are ANY sort of music aficionado, you’re going to spend a pretty good chunk of your yearly income building that collection with a by-the-song model. 

Do the math.  You’re wasting your money!    Do you really want to spend that amount just so you can listen to Mister Mister on the drive home?   I highly doubt it.  So why are you doing it?

Simple, because Apple and it’s iPod have dominated the marketplace, and made itself the “obvious” choice.  Much like the Band-Aid and Q-tip of generations past, The iPod has become SYNONYMOUS with the mp3 player.  Whether you own a Creative Zen, a Zune, or Sansa,  everyone just says, “What do you have on your iPod?”.

But that doesn’t mean that there aren’t alternatives.  My favorite of them is the Zune.  Sure it gets made fun of in the mainstream press, but that doesn’t hide the fact that the Zune Pass is one of the best deals in online music.

For $14.99 a month, the Zune Pass allows you to download an unlimited amount of music to up to 3 Zunes per account.   You have access to MILLIONS of dollars worth of music, any time you want.  Of course, when you stop paying, much like your cable bill,  the music stops flowing.  But let’s look into why that might not be as much of a deal-killer as it seems.

For most people, I don’t think that spending $14.99 a month on music is terribly expensive.  I know people who go to the the discount cd store once a month and spend well over $75 each time.  And considering that you can have up to 3 players per account, I don’t think it’s unreasonable to assume that 3 people wouldn’t spend around that much on music per month.

So let’s say you decided to stick with a Zune Pass for a year.  How much would it cost you?  

$179.88.  About the same as 12 physical Cds, 18 Albums on iTunes, or 179 individual songs on iTunes.

So Comparably, you could either FILL three 120 gigabyte Zunes with 30,000 songs each.   A total of 90,000 individual songs (if you only filled up the devices once) for $179.88, which goes away if you stop paying.  Or you could have 179 songs split between 5 iPods, but you “own” the songs.

Spreading the cost over 10 years, a subscription plan at $14.99 a month will still only cost you less than two thousand dollars.  Or less than a 2,000 song collection purchased on iTunes.

But you want to OWN your music,  not rent it!

The problem with the majority of iTunes music though, is that you don’t REALLY own the song.  Itunes Plus songs, you own, because they are DRM free, but the majority of the iTunes library has not yet moved that way.  The rest are coated with DRM called FairPlay.  This DRM makes sure you can only burn the songs to CD a certain number of times, transfer them between computers a certain number of times, and put them only on a certain number of iPods.  So what happens if in ten years Apple decides to shut off the FairPlay servers,  or they go with a different type of DRM and stop supporting FairPlay?  Your music could stop working, even though you paid for it, and even though you’re SUPPOSED to own it.  Will that happen?  It’s unlikely of course,  but it’s still a possibility.

Thankfully stores like Amazon have solved this for the most part.  They offer mp3’s with NO DRM for around the same amount as iTunes.  You don’t have to worry about this music ever shutting off, and the quality and selection is nearly as good as iTunes.  So far Amazon is a great success.  But that isn’t to say that your music is safe from there either.

The problem is that you still really don’t get a PHYSICAL copy of the music.  Computer hard drives are finicky things with lots of little moving parts.  They age, and they crash.  Sometimes you have warning, sometimes you don’t.  The fact of the matter is, the vast majority of people don’t back up their data, and when something goes wrong.  They lose everything.  Would you like to lose a $2,000 music collection with the flick of a switch?  I certainly wouldn’t.  There are ways to complain to customer service to get another download credit for your songs, but it’s complex  and annoying, and doesn’t work for everyone, so you really aren’t guaranteed against data loss when you buy from many of these music stores online.

Fortunately, when MY hard drive crashed early last year,  I didn’t have to worry about my music library.   While I lost some documents and photos (though not many, I back up online.),  all I had to do to restore my music was to simply log into my Zune client.  In the settings you’re presented with your personal download history, and in one click you can re-download every single song you used to have.   I clicked the button, left it overnight and had my entire music collection restored by the time I got home from work the next day.  All 136 gigabytes of it.

For me, my subscription music payment is just as much about data security as it is about selection.  Not only can I get just about every song I’ve ever wanted to hear,  I’m protected if and when I lose my data due to a crash or a virus.  I don’t have to worry about burning backup DVDs and squirreling them away, or paying exorbitant fees for hundreds of gigabytes of storage space in the cloud.  I just log into my Zune software, and get it all back.

Is everything all roses and happiness though?   No.  I wish I could use an iPhone or an iPod touch with the service.  They’re both fantastic devices, and I’d rather only carry my phone with music on it instead of a separate MP3 player and phone.  Don’t get me wrong, the Zune is a great device with awesome functionality and a great UI,  but it doesn’t come anywhere close to the iPhone in usability.  But if the price I have to pay for not spending thousands on a music collection is to have to carry two devices instead of one.  For me,  it’s worth every penny.

Tags: , , , , ,

Would you pay $66 for 1 megabyte of data? You already are.

July 31st, 2008 | 37 Comments | Posted in Corporate injustice, Editorial, Tech News by Justin Flood

Are you a fan of texting?  I certainly am.  There have been months when I blew through my texting plan, and got a nasty bill in the mail.  I was thinking about this today and It’s amazing how badly we are being ripped off by the phone companies for what amounts to just standard data.

Did you know that a full text message, including text and headers is only about 160 bytes?  That’s right.  BYTES,  not kilobytes, not megabytes.  Bytes.  And even if you have a texting plan for lets say 1000 messages for $10.00 a month,  you’re still paying 1 cent per text.  1 cent for 160 bytes.  In that sense, that doesn’t sound like much, I know.  It’s hard to get angry over 1 cent.  But in this time of high speed mobile internet, and $30 unlimited 3g data plans,  charging 1 cent for 160 bytes, is the internet equivalent of throwing you on a bed of hot coals and raping you.

Let me explain.

You’re average MP3 from iTunes or Zune, or wherever you get your music, is somewhere around 4 megabytes.  Thats 4,194,304 bytes.

So, if you were charged the same amount of money per byte to download your music,  guess how much that single mp3 would cost?

$262.14.   OVER TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS.  For a single song, downloaded once.

Hell, if you were charged that data rate,  guess how much it would cost you JUST to load the homepage of this site?

$32.00.  Just to go to ONE web site, ONE TIME.

Ridiculous isnt it?  And that is pricing based on having a texting plan.  Now granted, my math is off if you’re paying 10 cents per text,  or if you have an unlimited texting plan.   Also, you wouldn’t want to, nor be able to, transfer that much data over SMS, but the fact is, that since SMS messages are just standard data, there is absolutely no reason that Cellphone companies should charge you so much for so little data, especially in addition to an unlimited data plan.

The funny thing is, that people who would complain about tiered internet access, with 5GB per month caps, have no problem forking over the extra $10 per month for thier text plans.

This needs to stop, and it needs to stop now.  I would like to suggest sending a snail mail ( so that they actually read it ) letter to your mobile carrier, letting them know that you are fed up with the high prices for SMS data, and that a change needs to be made.  I’ll be sending mine to T-Mobile today.

Tags: , , ,

AP decides to charge for fair use excerpts – Screw you AP.

June 17th, 2008 | No Comments | Posted in Corporate injustice, General News by Justin Flood

Apparently a few days ago, the Associated Press sent website The Drudge Retort (yes Retort, not Report) a number of DMCA takedown notices for copyrighted material.   What material was that you ask?  Oh just excerpts of AP stories as short as 39 words!

Excuse me AP,  but have you ever heard of a little something called “fair use”?  Yeah it really IS a law, and it in fact DOES have a provision for excerpting for news purposes.  In fact, you should be happy that people WANT to excerpt your stories.  When they do, you have a much better chance for getting linked hits to your site.

Unfortunately, the AP made the situation even worse today by suggesting that fair use has no place on the internet and deciding that they can arbitrarily charge for excerpts.  These charges start at $12.50 for an excerpt 5-26 words in length, with a sliding scale for more words.

The complete idiocy of this position leads me to ask everyone blogging on the internet to completely ignore AP stories from this point on.  Get your information elsewhere!  Fair use should allow you to excerpt a story while giving your commentary on it.  If someone wants to charge for an excerpt, the simplest thing to do is to not use them as a news source.

Also, taking it a step further.  If any of you out there get quoted BY AP in a story, please send them a bill using their own scale based on the number of  words that they quote you.  Seriously!  Fight fire with fire.  Hold them to the standard of crap that they have set that goes against everything we stand for in free speech and copyright law.  We have the right to fair use, and we shouldn’t let greedy organizations like the AP forget it!

Tags: , ,