Browse > Home /

| Subcribe via RSS

Would you pay $66 for 1 megabyte of data? You already are.

July 31st, 2008 | 37 Comments | Posted in Corporate injustice, Editorial, Tech News by Justin Flood

Are you a fan of texting?  I certainly am.  There have been months when I blew through my texting plan, and got a nasty bill in the mail.  I was thinking about this today and It’s amazing how badly we are being ripped off by the phone companies for what amounts to just standard data.

Did you know that a full text message, including text and headers is only about 160 bytes?  That’s right.  BYTES,  not kilobytes, not megabytes.  Bytes.  And even if you have a texting plan for lets say 1000 messages for $10.00 a month,  you’re still paying 1 cent per text.  1 cent for 160 bytes.  In that sense, that doesn’t sound like much, I know.  It’s hard to get angry over 1 cent.  But in this time of high speed mobile internet, and $30 unlimited 3g data plans,  charging 1 cent for 160 bytes, is the internet equivalent of throwing you on a bed of hot coals and raping you.

Let me explain.

You’re average MP3 from iTunes or Zune, or wherever you get your music, is somewhere around 4 megabytes.  Thats 4,194,304 bytes.

So, if you were charged the same amount of money per byte to download your music,  guess how much that single mp3 would cost?

$262.14.   OVER TWO HUNDRED DOLLARS.  For a single song, downloaded once.

Hell, if you were charged that data rate,  guess how much it would cost you JUST to load the homepage of this site?

$32.00.  Just to go to ONE web site, ONE TIME.

Ridiculous isnt it?  And that is pricing based on having a texting plan.  Now granted, my math is off if you’re paying 10 cents per text,  or if you have an unlimited texting plan.   Also, you wouldn’t want to, nor be able to, transfer that much data over SMS, but the fact is, that since SMS messages are just standard data, there is absolutely no reason that Cellphone companies should charge you so much for so little data, especially in addition to an unlimited data plan.

The funny thing is, that people who would complain about tiered internet access, with 5GB per month caps, have no problem forking over the extra $10 per month for thier text plans.

This needs to stop, and it needs to stop now.  I would like to suggest sending a snail mail ( so that they actually read it ) letter to your mobile carrier, letting them know that you are fed up with the high prices for SMS data, and that a change needs to be made.  I’ll be sending mine to T-Mobile today.

Tags: , , ,

iPhone 3g – 8gig for $199 (!) coming July 11th

June 9th, 2008 | No Comments | Posted in Tech News by Justin Flood

wwdc-keynote_190.jpg

Today was the day of the big Steve Jobs keynote, as expected he announced the availability of a new iPhone called the iPhone 3g. Also as expected, it has 3g data, a GPS, and all the cool new features from 3rd party apps. No front facing camera or iChat announced ( oh well ). The biggest deal is that the new iPhone will sell for $199 with a 2 year contract from AT&T, as well as from the multitude of other countries that have signed on board.

Ok so I’m not going to rant about it. It’s awesome. Get yourself one on July 11th.

Oh Apple? One more thing.. How about some copy and paste? Kthx.

Oh and one more more thing? I know I was wrong about those leaked pics, so you don’t have to email :)

Tags: , , , ,

3g iPhone pictures leaked hot on the heels of the specs!

June 7th, 2008 | No Comments | Posted in Tech News by Justin Flood

iphone2_1.jpg

Well, its all over Techmeme so I guess it’s official. Crunchgear, the site that leaked photos of the most recent iPod nanos that everyone thought were fake until steve showed them off, have now released extremely credible looking shots of the upcoming iPhone 3g. Biggest thing “confirmed” with these shots is that it will indeed feature a forward facing camera, and have video conferencing via iChat. Also it appears that along with Safari, Apple will now be releasing the iChat software for windows. Neat!

Gotta say I really like the macbook air like curves of this new iPhone, even if the thickest part of the phone is a bit thicker than the previous (perhaps to house a bigger battery), the overall impression is that the phone is thinner. Alas there is still no flash or light for the camera on either side, but we can hope for at least a megapixel boost on the images.

IMG_0454.jpg

IMG_0462.jpg

IMG_0468.jpg

IMG_0473.jpg

IMG_0480.jpg

Translation of Text: iChat. Now showing everywhere.

Video just became a little more fun. Start a real time video chat with other AT&T subscribers via 3G networking, or with iChat buddies via WiFi. The video calling revolution has begun.

Now Available for iPhone – and Windows!

IMG_0481.jpg

Text Translation:

Exchange Ideas.

iPhone now integrates seamlessly with your corporate Microsoft ActiveSync(tm) server for over the air syncing of contacts, calendars, and email.

Additionally MobileME by Apple brings all of the exciting new capabilities of iPhone to everyone.

IMG_0453.jpg

So there you go, drink it in. I have to say it looks really sweet. And it looks like MobileME is pretty much confirmed now as well. This makes sense since Apple wouldn’t want to rely on a Microsoft product for over the air syncing of stuff like that. They want everyone who has the phone to be able to use it, so re-branding .Mac and giving it some more capabilities in the mobile space totally makes sense. I’m absolutely looking forward to seeing what else MobileME can do, because I’m sure that in true Apple style, over the air syncing isn’t even the half of it.

Of course, nothing is confirmed until Steve actually takes the stage and unsheathes the new iPhone from a special pocket or envelope or something. But these look pretty legit, so I’m going to think it’s real. We shall see on Monday!

Tags: , , , , , ,

I love Blackberry, but they are in some deep…..Yeah.

May 11th, 2008 | 6 Comments | Posted in Gadgets, Tech News by Justin Flood

rogersblackberry9000we0.jpg

Blackberry 9000 (Bold) photo courtesy of Boy Genius Report:

Listen Blackberry, I was a proud owner of the Blackberry Pearl. It was a fantastic phone, I loved it until the scrollball decided it didn’t want to work anymore. But you guys are in some deep poo. Seriously. Apple has backed you guys into a corner and you didn’t even see it coming.

Apple is readying it’s second generation iPhone which is rumored to have both a 3G chipset and possible GPS support. Along with the release will come the next edition of the software with support for enterprise features like exchange support, push e-mail and calendering, as well as security features like remote wipe. Along with the software development kit that was released allowing for businesses to write specific enterprise apps, as well as games and social apps. Not only will this increase the marketshare of the average cellphone user, this will place the iPhone squarely in the domain of the enterprise, the stronghold of RIM, the makers of the Blackberry.

It’s obvious that the people up in Cupertino have spent an inordinate amount of time developing the iPhone, but the task of perfecting it was put to the early adopters. iPhone version 1 was nothing more than a modern day beta test. They knew they had the hardware and design ends down, but they released it with a general lack of features compared to most handsets. Apple wanted to see exactly what people REALLY wanted and needed in a phone, so that instead of filling it with useless and endless numbers of features, it has exactly what people want and need.

The jailbreaking community proved that consumers want 3rd party apps and that people we’re willing to develop for the platform. The unlocking community proved that there is a market for an unlocked model of the phone. And businesses clamoring for enterprise support on the device proved that there are inroads that can be made in the marketshare of Blackberry and Windows Mobile.

Unfortunately for RIM, this puts them in the position of having to play catch-up with Apple’s iPhone, a position that has been problematic for nearly every company put into the position. Microsoft, Creative and Sandisk are companies that have tried to make inroads into the iPod marketshare with very little success, and it’s all for one simple reason. The only company willing to take chances with design and functionality is Apple.

Apple is willing to break the mold as it were. The iPhone eschewed the standard flip/slider/qwerty model for a phone with only one button and a beautiful large touchscreen. It isnt that the technology didn’t exist, it’s that Apple was the only company really willing to try. Of course Windows Mobile had been doing touchscreens for years, but unfortunately they were still stuck in the mindset of PDA’s from previous generations. Though you could use a finger on those screens, they were made for easy to use styluses. There was no multi-touch capability, and the whole process was clunky to say the least. Apple was willing to put in the time and research and money to EVOLVE the cellphone from where it had kind of stalled.

It’s obvious to anyone that Apple could have simply put a cellphone chip into an ipod and used the click wheel to dial or text. Or perhaps stolen a slider design from LG or Samsung and called it a day. It’s silly, and I’m sure that a prototype in those fashions were built. But it’s simply not Apple’s style. What they have now isn’t perfect however. I’ll be the first to agree that typing on the iPhone is far from perfect, but you can expect that it will be worked on and fixed in the next version or two. Apple very rarely leaves “good enough” alone. They make sure to move the game forward with any product they release, forcing everyone else into the position of either cloning what they do, or sticking with an old and clunky model of working, and proclaiming that the future is bad and the old way of doing things is better.

Coincidentally (and unfortunately) RIM is doing both.

Take a look at the Blackberry 9000 at the top of this article. Those rounded edges, that chrome bezel. What does it look like? That’s right, the iPhone. But what else is there? That QWERTY keyboard. So they are aping Apple’s industrial design but keeping the general Blackberry style that has served them so well in the past. Is it just me, or is this the worst possible thing they could have done. It’s basically admitting that they don’t know what to do about the iPhone, so they just kinda make the new device look like it, except that it’s just the same old Blackberry with a new skin on it. Sure it’s pretty but it’s just basically a “here take my marketshare” card from RIM to Apple. What is necessary from RIM is a device that is a generational leap ahead of anything they are probably working on.

Chances are in the RIM labs now they are researching just how to make a nice looking multitouch phone, instead of thinking about how to get AHEAD of the game. They are being forced into that classic post-Apple role of playing catch up. It also looks like every other cellphone company is on the same track, with LG, Samsung, and Nokia all making touch screen iPhone clones, though some with sliding keyboards, and some with speakers and all sorts of wierd things that are a sad attempt at making their products seem better than the iPhone.

It’s as simple as this, Apple joined the game in first place. They set the trend for years to come, and as long as companies are trying to out-do this years iPhone, instead of thinking ahead. It looks like Apple will be at the head of the class for the forseeable future.

This is why RIM is in serious trouble. If the iPhone takes off in the enterprise like it should, you can expect that RIM will be mortally wounded by it. Samsung, LG, and Nokia have no problem making the low-end free phones and othe rmodels that will keep them in business for years, but RIM makes e-mail based smartphones. That’s it. If they go right up against Apple and the iPhone without taking risks and experimenting, they are as good as out of business.

Tags: , , , , , ,